Search
Notices
Envoy Airlines Regional Airline

Where is Charlie Bucket?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-01-2020, 01:13 PM
  #111  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2019
Posts: 150
Default

Originally Posted by dera View Post
How would that benefit Envoy pilots?
Exactly. It doesn’t.

Give us mainline seniority numbers, however, I’ll gladly be furloughed and go find work doing whatever in the meantime.
6ix9ineYearFlow is offline  
Old 07-01-2020, 01:24 PM
  #112  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2019
Posts: 133
Default

Reminder to not negotiate here. Email the union...
skyemiles2 is offline  
Old 07-01-2020, 01:28 PM
  #113  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2017
Posts: 2,510
Default

Originally Posted by AB321Driver View Post
Heard there is a Flowthru/Flowback provision in the works.
Quit trolling.

I highly doubt the Voy would want that either. Every Flowback would be a training event and put one more trained Envoy pilot on the street that would have to be retrained when recalled. Lots of expense and zero benefit to the company.
pitchattitude is offline  
Old 07-01-2020, 01:38 PM
  #114  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2018
Posts: 181
Default

Originally Posted by Cyio View Post
So correct me if I am wrong, but how did you come up with "half" of new hire pilots being Envoy? We are long past those days are we not? While your assumptions are great about the flow value going up, they are all tied to AA being able to stay afloat, not file BK, not change our contract etc. I think it is an overly optimistic view to think AA will skate past this and not file BK.

Trust me, I hope you are right, I just dont think you are.
I think he said half of new hires from the WO. While it may not quite be half, that would probably be pretty close.
AV8R72 is offline  
Old 07-01-2020, 08:40 PM
  #115  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Tyrion's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2018
Position: Flying with my right hand again
Posts: 199
Default

Originally Posted by AV8R72 View Post
I think he said half of new hires from the WO. While it may not quite be half, that would probably be pretty close.
It all depends on class sizes and monthly new hires. If AA hires 60 per month or less, the WO flows will get about half the seats. If it is 100 per month, the WOs will account about a third of the seats.

All of those extra seats will just be a bunch of military and street hires jumping ahead of the flows on the AA seniority list.

I'm not sure why anyone would want flowbacks. I don't think anyone is asking for them.
Tyrion is offline  
Old 07-02-2020, 05:21 AM
  #116  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2018
Position: Resigned
Posts: 1,547
Default

Originally Posted by Tyrion View Post
It all depends on class sizes and monthly new hires. If AA hires 60 per month or less, the WO flows will get about half the seats. If it is 100 per month, the WOs will account about a third of the seats.

All of those extra seats will just be a bunch of military and street hires jumping ahead of the flows on the AA seniority list.

I'm not sure why anyone would want flowbacks. I don't think anyone is asking for them.
Can't see why an AA pilot would want to come here and drive an Embraer around for peanuts when they could just liquidate one or two of their vacation homes and live off that until they get recalled.
NoValueAviator is offline  
Old 07-02-2020, 07:00 AM
  #117  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Cujo665's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2014
Position: Semi-Retired...
Posts: 3,127
Default

Originally Posted by 6ix9ineYearFlow View Post
Exactly. It doesn’t.

Give us mainline seniority numbers, however, I’ll gladly be furloughed and go find work doing whatever in the meantime.
That didn't work so well for the first four party agreement. Took them 13 years to flow, after losing their left seats to flowbacks, and FO's not upgrading, being pushed down the seniority list, and furloughed from the bottom.
They didn't get to flow over and bid with their 13 year seniority number either. AMR played games with that too....


The company will push APA for scope exceptions so they can run smaller planes on the routes until the loads pick back up to some agreed upon metric.
The opportunity here is to merge all the airlines. Not sure the sixth floor can get that far outside the box; but this would be the time to do it. Restructuring into one big carrier saves them a ton of administration costs. It wipes out the majority of scope issues, allowing them to right size the plane to the route. The APA and ENY ALPA would have to again agree to a modified CBA and pay rate plan that AAG previously said would work for the pilots, but nothing similar had yet been negotiated by the other work groups.

The downside is an AA furlough could be a few thousand easily; that could put everybody currently at ENY on the street. So, rather than simply dust off the old APA/EGL ALPA agreement outline, I'd suggest a modification to include some level of furlough protection. A furlough fence where only a certain percentage would be allowed to bid down to the smaller jets.... say 50%.
The fence would stop at the last pilot hired at DOS. after that nobody has any fence protection. It would be a straight from the bottom furlough.

just spit-balling ways to make this work for the pilots in the long run.

Last edited by Cujo665; 07-02-2020 at 07:13 AM.
Cujo665 is offline  
Old 07-02-2020, 10:14 AM
  #118  
In a land of unicorns
 
Joined APC: Apr 2014
Position: Whale FO
Posts: 6,469
Default

Originally Posted by Cujo665 View Post
That didn't work so well for the first four party agreement. Took them 13 years to flow, after losing their left seats to flowbacks, and FO's not upgrading, being pushed down the seniority list, and furloughed from the bottom.
They didn't get to flow over and bid with their 13 year seniority number either. AMR played games with that too....


The company will push APA for scope exceptions so they can run smaller planes on the routes until the loads pick back up to some agreed upon metric.
The opportunity here is to merge all the airlines. Not sure the sixth floor can get that far outside the box; but this would be the time to do it. Restructuring into one big carrier saves them a ton of administration costs. It wipes out the majority of scope issues, allowing them to right size the plane to the route. The APA and ENY ALPA would have to again agree to a modified CBA and pay rate plan that AAG previously said would work for the pilots, but nothing similar had yet been negotiated by the other work groups.

The downside is an AA furlough could be a few thousand easily; that could put everybody currently at ENY on the street. So, rather than simply dust off the old APA/EGL ALPA agreement outline, I'd suggest a modification to include some level of furlough protection. A furlough fence where only a certain percentage would be allowed to bid down to the smaller jets.... say 50%.
The fence would stop at the last pilot hired at DOS. after that nobody has any fence protection. It would be a straight from the bottom furlough.

just spit-balling ways to make this work for the pilots in the long run.
#824neveragain.
Just saying. That will never happen.
Neither will the merger.
dera is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
ERAUAV8TR
Envoy Airlines
6
02-04-2019 08:08 AM
SpreadEagle
Regional
9
01-20-2017 05:36 AM
Reservist
Regional
7
03-16-2016 06:41 AM
CaptainCarl
In Memory Of
3
05-31-2013 10:13 AM
Jetjock65
Regional
4
10-27-2008 05:05 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices