Originally Posted by
highfarfast
Eh, Rick isn't doing this to be decent.
I don't think it would matter if they 'relaxed' the language. The "proffer to displace" option I think would function as a vacancy unless there's something special in that provision regarding FOs or something (been a while since I read it). It's not the same thing but if you could have held it if there was a vacancy, you could probably hold it with proffer to displace if there's no vacancy.
I guess I didn’t realize how it works. So proffer to displace goes in seniority order instead of reverse?