Originally Posted by
OTZeagle1
SFO at this point will not be a base once the 320 is gone.
Any insight as to why? On the webcast today they kept talking about “recapturing the California market.” Seems counterintuitive to then close a base in a major California city. Why not just keep it with 73s? Closing SFO is the biggest head-scratcher to me, but then again I don’t have access to all the information.