Originally Posted by
pitchattitude
This is the case at Delta and United as well. That’s why they are seeing the light and trying to reduce the fleet types. But it will be a long and costly process.
Yeah, the combination of different type ratings with different pay rates (and different bases) and the seniority system creates a truly hellish training load when you are forced to furlough or return pilots from furlough. That’s one of the reasons Boeing came up with the dual 757/767 type rating to begin with. I’m not sure why Boeing abandoned that concept but Airbus sure picked it up and ran with it - in fact raised it to an even higher standard with their A320 ‘family’ allowing you to fly anything from A319/320/321CEOs all the way through A319/320/321NEOs and 321LRs and 321XLRs on the same type, with relatively minimum differences trading for 330s and 350s. And a multiple type fleet is also expensive for maintainers, both in terms of parts and maintaining experience on the specific fleet type.
The single fleet-type airlines like SWA, NK, and F9 have a huge advantage over AA, UA, and DL in this regard, and the former do seem to now be realizing that. The fact that a year “x” pilot on any of the aircraft can be assigned to any aircraft in the fleet but gets the same pay regardless is also a huge help, since bidding to a different aircraft type (assuming there were any) for more money causes a lot of expense in training as well, short term equipment locks notwithstanding.
But you are right, it is a long and costly process. And it will continue to hinder the three biggest legacies well into the time that the single fleet airlines are recovering. Especially AA which has furloughed.