Originally Posted by
BoilerUP
My point was your definition of “hoaxer” was ridiculously, overly broad because you lumped ANY criticism of mitigation efforts, or mention of the downsides of those mitigation efforts, into the “hoaxer” category.
You threw the baby out with the bath water and in doing so, surrendered nuance, logic, reason and intellectual discourse on this topic to your own emotion.
I understand, nothing against you. But my general point back then was for the actual hoaxers on here and they know who they are. There’s a difference between learning to live with it and flat out denying mandates.