View Single Post
Old 02-22-2021 | 07:50 PM
  #346  
CLE to IAH
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jun 2019
Posts: 1,284
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Excargodog
You investigate the most probable first obviously - but it’s been what? Nearly two years? So yeah, if it hasn’t been figured out by now you are probably going to be ranging pretty far afield. I hear GWs secret service contingent vouched for his whereabouts. The plane was recovered pretty much intact so I figure the nanobots or the termites would have been discovered by now.

I’m not sure the NTSB has the security clearances for Groom Lake but the Security coordinator there will verify that I’ve never been there so I can’t confirm or deny the alien hypothesis. And you can believe him too, I’ll vouch for him.

So why do YOU think they made two approaches paralleling the VOR?
I wasn’t there..... my answer to that will be speculation based on what I’ve heard from people at C5


Although, based on what I HAVE heard and seen and read, pilot error seems more likely than cellphone induced deviation. If that was the case (twice) in two approaches, that’s a 100% deviation rate for this magical nuclear cell phone in question. Wonder why it doesn’t happen more often....as a commuter, I see everyone around me texting and facebooking from about 3,000ft AGL and down.

i also wonder why they called the runway “in sight”...

anyhow. I’m not going to keep going round and round with you and a mesa guy on an envoy forum about cell phones crashing C5 planes. You can have the last word.... just remember my wager

If this gets blamed or even alluded to have been caused by cell phones, I’ll buy you that beer (or cranberry juice, if that’s your preference.)

:-)
Reply