Originally Posted by
RonRicco
Ok. Does the same apply to Scope? Just let them violate it and get paid later?
The majority of the posts I have seen over the years say we want them to “honor the contract” and “stop illegal reroutes” and “they were not supposed to do that to me.”
We need to be consistent. Do we want them to honor the contract (QOL) or are we ok just getting paid off for not doing it?
Vastly underrated post right here^^^^^^^^^. Getting 'paid' for scope violations is beyond idiotic. Scope violations should carry punitive damages that are immediate and permanent.
Edit: and what I mean by punitive is that the 'balance' of what has been violated should come to our side of the ledger, immediately.... and that should be permanent.