Old 03-14-2021 | 09:08 PM
  #86  
DrJekyll MrHyde
Line Holder
 
Joined: Aug 2016
Posts: 714
Likes: 8
From: Bus CA
Default

Originally Posted by Powderkeg
Except the 737...it’s not cost efficient.
Had they pulled off the MAX version of the 737 airframe without software induced fatalities it would have been incredibly cost efficient. Nothing like using the majority of the same tools and jigs to produce essentially the same airframe for nearly five decades. The first moon landing came after the first 737 flight.

It’s sad to see something as long lived as the Cessna SkyChicken still out performing 121 service.
Reply