View Single Post
Old 02-16-2008 | 01:38 PM
  #17  
ToiletDuck's Avatar
ToiletDuck
Che Guevara
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 6,408
Likes: 0
Default

To me this says it all.
In determining what is considered compensation, it has been the FAA's long–standing policy to define compensation in very broad terms. For example, any reimbursement of expenses (fuel, oil, transportation, lodging, meals, etc.), if conditioned upon the pilot operating the aircraft, would constitute compensation. In addition, the building up of flight time may be compensatory in nature if the pilot does not have to pay the costs of operating the aircraft. While it could be argued that the accumulation of flight time is not always of value to the pilot involved, the FAA does not consider it appropriate to enter into a case–by–case analysis to determine whether the logging of time is of value to a particular pilot, or what the pilot's motives or intentions are on each flight.
Flight time logged, that you didn't pay for, is considered compensatory. They say the FAA does not handle it on a case by case basis. So this broad/general statement is all we're getting. All the things I listed would be considered illegal by this. I worked all through college to pay my rent/tuition but my parents did pay for my flight training. According to this that was illegal. BS.
Reply