Originally Posted by Vsop

Sailing this isn’t meant to be directed at you just using the language you quoted in the LOA.

The company seems to view the “at another carrier” language as permission to substitute an Endeavor flow agreement. I think that because we have been without a flow agreement we have moved past this language and the company can’t retroactively add Endeavor. I think this language would have come into play if we had a flow “at another carrier” prior to the Compass being terminated, and would have allowed the RJs to stay in the DCI system.
In my opinion once the company had to park the 35 RJs, other language for modifying or canceling the LOA became the “effective” section.
If I haven’t said it enough, just my opinion I’m not a lawyer.