Originally Posted by
Flydafe
As much as I love the dialogue.. it’s time to move on from debating ivermectin. The NIH has it listed as a treatment on their website. Even has a link to the clinical trails. Hopefully this will end the back and forth over the subject
https://www.covid19treatmentguidelin...bles/table-2e/
curious, did you actually read the website and some of the trial information, or did you see “ivermectin” and assume it’s been approved? Because the header of the website you supplied reads characteristics of antiviral agents that are approved
or under evaluation for covid treatment. I didn’t take the time to look at all the completed trials, but the highest number of people in the studies that I saw was 400. I’m not a doctor so can’t really decipher the results, but with such a small sample size, I can tell you that the studies are next to meaningless.
look, it would be great if ivermectin worked, but it sure doesn’t seem like it does, there doesn’t seem to be any large, reputable clinical trial that has established its efficacy.
as to your comment about robert Malone, this is an interesting article about him:
https://www.theatlantic.com/science/...keptic/619734/