Originally Posted by
BertMacklinFBI
Similar viral loads. The ideal your trying to grasp is similar. Not higher. But keep cherry picking the science you want to believe in, Meat Fighter. I don’t care vax or no vax. But at least speak some truths that are widely accepted.
Here are some more numbers for you to dispute. A few Minnesota hospitals released the percentage of hospitalized with and without vaccine and amount needing ICU. News flash. Of those hospitalized. It was the unvaxxed that took the cake.
https://www.google.com/amp/s/bringme...d-unvaccinated
Just take a peek at the pictorials credited to the institutions. I’m sure the source is not good enough for you…it was the first I could find with the pictorials, but the pictorials are from the hospitals. Pictures are easy to understand. Good luck! If you wanna bash the hospitals reports which you likely will. Fire away I guess?
Not going to disagree with the data or pictures. But I would ask a few questions.
1. How many of the designated unvaxxed have had one shot or are within two weeks of their second shot?
2. Why is there such a disparity between this data set and other countries like Israel or Singapore or Gibraltor or even states like Vermont that have a much higher vaccination rate?
That being said, back to my original point. What is the predicate for mandating a treatment that does prevent transmission?
Sent from my SM-G970U1 using Tapatalk