Asking for a friend, if the two new oral treatments that have been approved (US UK) are as effective as the makers claim, wouldn't they be an alternative treatment? And, isn't an Emergency Use Authorization predicated on, no alternative treatment available? And, as for Comirnaty, didn't the CDC just admit it is NOT exactly the same as what is available in the US? If it isn't exactly the same, from a legal perspective, then the ones here are still under EUA. It has to be legal, because it has to be in accordance federal regulation which carry the weight of law. Reference the Administrative Procedures Act.

For the keyboard kommandos, the simplest epidimiological action is to jab everyone, then sort it out later. Like Army Anti Air, shoot every airplane down then sort it out later, on the ground. Plus, as time goes by, the largest safety and side effect studies in the history of mankind will have been completed, but that will take several years (3-6). From a individual health perspective, you are rolling the dice of a small statistical study on whether you will have an adverse reaction that is ground-able. From personal experience, going on disability is much easier if your highest 12 month consecutive earnings in the previous 36 months is over 200k versus not much over 120k. As for adverse reactions, VAERS website is available to the kommandos too, if they can decide to learn a little. It's like aviation safety, great statistics until you be one.