Originally Posted by
Huh really
Asking for a friend, if the two new oral treatments that have been approved (US UK) are as effective as the makers claim, wouldn't they be an alternative treatment? And, isn't an Emergency Use Authorization predicated on, no alternative treatment available? And, as for Comirnaty, didn't the CDC just admit it is NOT exactly the same as what is available in the US? If it isn't exactly the same, from a legal perspective, then the ones here are still under EUA. It has to be legal, because it has to be in accordance federal regulation which carry the weight of law. Reference the Administrative Procedures Act.
For the keyboard kommandos, the simplest epidimiological action is to jab everyone, then sort it out later. Like Army Anti Air, shoot every airplane down then sort it out later, on the ground. Plus, as time goes by, the largest safety and side effect studies in the history of mankind will have been completed, but that will take several years (3-6). From a individual health perspective, you are rolling the dice of a small statistical study on whether you will have an adverse reaction that is ground-able. From personal experience, going on disability is much easier if your highest 12 month consecutive earnings in the previous 36 months is over 200k versus not much over 120k. As for adverse reactions, VAERS website is available to the kommandos too, if they can decide to learn a little. It's like aviation safety, great statistics until you be one.
Your questions concerning an EUA, viable alternative treatments and Comirnaty are all correct. If you go to the FDA website you can search for the definition of an EUA. It clearly states that an EUA cannot exist if there are viable alternative treatments.
I have a full copy of the FDA approval for Comirnaty which is the patented name for the FDA approved mENA vaccine. The document also extends the EUA for the Pfizer shot currently being used in the U.S. As a condition of approval for Comirnaty the FDA required a new WARNING on the label for Myocarditis.
Once a viable alternative treatment is approved, the EUA’s cannot coexist unless the other treatments are also under an EUA.
Now for some interesting news since it was a big day yesterday with the federal judge halting Biden’s mandate.
This is my research below and then some links follow:
Emergent Biosolutions is the same company with the same CEO that rebranded their name from Bioport. This is the company that was awarded the sole source contract from the DOD for the Anthrax vaccine. They were cited by the FDA for numerous violations and ultimately issued a letter of intent to revoke their license. Emergent Biosolutions is the company making and distributing the J & J COVID vaccine. They have already had to pause for poor manufacturing standards and had to destroy millions of contaminated doses of the J & J vaccine.
https://www.theepochtimes.com/us-can...heLibertyDaily
Well if it’s any comfort Pfizer manipulated their clinical trial data as stated in this major peer reviewed medical journal.
https://www.bmj.com/content/375/bmj.n2635
Video with analysis of the Pfizer clinical trials here:
https://youtu.be/THv33zWykJc
https://youtu.be/_LzcGOjDl8Q
And let’s not leave out Moderna. They have never had an FDA approved drug or vaccine in the history of the company. Then in record time they come out with a “safe and effective” vaccine that was authorized under an EUA. Still not FDA approved.