We expect rumors will begin to emanate...
- Company response “diametrically opposed” to union retirement proposal. “ Bankruptcy era response.” B plan only?
- “It reflects very few of the pilot inputs that formed the basis of our retirement proposal.”
Pilot inputs demanded pancakes? Company apparently allergic to pancakes. Me too.
- Company says pancakes are cost prohibitive. Who the heck knows since there is no codified funding requirement concerning pancake plans with permanent stabilization side savings accounts in existence.
- Lots of “the company doesn’t want you to know what they REALLY want to do to your benefits” and what they really DONT want you to know is”.
If we only knew what our actual retirement proposal was (pancake vs increase current plan) AND if that actually aligned with the desire of the pilot group concerning the pancake plan then outrage could be shared.
Instead it’s all cryptic and angry about what we don’t even know.
Cue the rumors from various sources - this means the membership probably needs a more clear explanation of our own position.