Originally Posted by DR K;[url=tel:3325554

3325554[/url]]I am asking for a clear message so we can unite - exactly opposite of what you say.

if the pancake plan is our goal what then say it and let’s unify if possible.

Are we proposing that our retirement be fundamentally altered to a brand new plan? Seems like this is a basic question that the membership should know before the negotiation fight.

Why do you think we should shut up and work until it’s time to vote? Aren’t you curious or worried if the pancake plan is in it?

Why is the membership the only group not allowed to know if we are asking for a pancake plan for ourselves? Obviously the negotiating committee and company know - we are first ones that need to know - instead we should plan for finding out at the ta.

I’m not sure why demanding this critical information is divisive. Or why we need to keep muzzled if we have questions about completely changing the backbone of our retirement when we get a negotiating email like that.

A clear message would unify and you probably know that. Concealing such enormous details as a replacement pancake plan from the membership is not a good way to conduct business. Unite with information. Withholding information only divides wouldn’t you agree?