Thread: WB Reserve
View Single Post
Old 12-22-2021 | 07:58 AM
  #29  
Hilltopper89's Avatar
Hilltopper89
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Oct 2012
Posts: 1,061
Likes: 0
From: 737
Default

Originally Posted by hummingbear
Years on property is a skewed way to view seniority because hiring rates fluctuate so much over time. There are spots on the seniority list where a couple hundred numbers can represent a years long disparity in hire dates, whereas at the current bottom end of the seniority list it represents only a couple of weeks.

6,000 is a long time pre-merger, so the hire date would depend on which legacy carrier the person started at. Someone in that seniority band can certainly come up with the longevity numbers, but it probably paints a much more accurate picture to think of it as around 45% seniority.
This. 8700 seniority is about early 2013 hire while 8500 is more like a CAL 2008 hire. 2006 CAL hires are significantly more senior than UAL 2000 hires.
Reply