The company thinks we’re worth 3%.
The MEC thinks we’re worth 3%.
The company says this is the last best offer.
The MEC says this is the last best offer.
The company says we should vote in favor of LOA 17 and not take chances with arbitration.
The MEC says we should vote in favor of LOA 17 and not take chances with arbitration.
The company says the scope protections offered in LOA 17 are sufficient.
The MEC says the scope protections offered in LOA are sufficient.
Do you understand why I use the terms “company” and “MEC” interchangeably when talking about LOA 17? I still don’t agree that this constitutes “dividing the union”.