Originally Posted by
Bluewaffle
I guess that's where we disagree. As long as the total number of express seats allowed go down, I dont care what the jet allocation is.
So you'd be cool if they gave up 150 50-seat aircraft at express (7500 seats total) and replaced them with 74 100-seat aircraft and one more 76 seat aircraft (total of 7476 seats) at express for a net reduction of 24 seats? Yikes.
Originally Posted by
FriendlyPilot
So you’re deciding this based on a pandemic? Even with 0 RJs they’d have tried to furlough the pilots. What makes you think that no RJ’s means the company can’t furlough? They’d have still furloughed. Vote how you want, but flying a few more 76 seaters and getting rid of 200 50 seaters is a massive scope gain. Massive.
No. More 76 seaters is a scope loss.