View Single Post
Old 07-20-2022, 08:35 AM
  #8  
rickair7777
Prime Minister/Moderator
 
rickair7777's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Engines Turn Or People Swim
Posts: 39,253
Default

Originally Posted by Excargodog View Post
Still, it creates a single point failure mode. I suppose you could have the single pilot wear one eyepatch to decrease the chance they might be flashblinded by a laser or nuke near-miss, but you might well have the better part of a squadron of fighters depending on that one tanker to get them to the target or get home.and it isn’t just the cost of the ~$200 million tanker and 3-4 F-35s at $100 million apiece you are talking about, but the cost of all the infrastructure and logistics necessary to get them mission-capable to begin with - not to mention the lives of the receiver aircraft crews themselves you are putting at risk.

All to save one FO slot?

Maybe they can subcontract the FO slots out to Skywest or Republic.
I didn't say I thought it was a good idea.

The Navy had similar issues with concepts to automate ships and reduce headcount... all well and good until you get battle damage and have to fight the ship AND do damage control with a skeleton crew.
rickair7777 is offline