Originally Posted by
pangolin
Two questions:
What do you think in a QOL deficiency at mesa that doesn’t exist at other airlines?
I don't work at Mesa and am relying on current pilots to share their thoughts and opinions on perceived QOL issues. But point taken that each airline will have their own QOL shortcomings.
Originally Posted by
pangolin
Second: what QOL deficiency would be made up for with a higher salary?
Commutability of lines is one example. With better pay, one can afford a hotel room if they need it on the front and back end of a trip. Not all QOL issues would be solved by pay. Some would just be more "palatable". What are some of the most common gripes amongst Mesa pilots as it relates to QOL?