View Single Post
Old 09-12-2022 | 07:22 PM
  #148  
Noworkallplay
Banned
 
Joined: Jun 2018
Posts: 1,838
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by FXLAX
If it truly is more cost efficient to have FedEx pilots fly it, wouldn’t have FedEx pilots flown it?
If you don’t have the airplanes or the pilots then you can’t. Hints the wet leases going away as staffing is getting caught up, per SIG notes this month. As Kronan posted above, they don’t pay just an FO rate. 3 possible penalties triggered. Proofs in the fleet count and history. It works!

If it was more cost efficient to wet lease and pay the penalty payments then why increase the fleet count consistently and increase FDX pilot jobs? Why not just outsource and pay the penalty payments? A bean counter obviously does the math and comes to the same conclusion.
Reply