Long term outsourcing agreement
#151
On Reserve
Joined: Feb 2019
Posts: 173
Likes: 0
because he’s a paid company troll. Probably works in flight management as a non-pilot.
#152
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Nov 2017
Posts: 2,174
Likes: 1
If you don’t have the airplanes or the pilots then you can’t. Hints the wet leases going away as staffing is getting caught up, per SIG notes this month. As Kronan posted above, they don’t pay just an FO rate. 3 possible penalties triggered. Proofs in the fleet count and history. It works!
If it was more cost efficient to wet lease and pay the penalty payments then why increase the fleet count consistently and increase FDX pilot jobs? Why not just outsource and pay the penalty payments? A bean counter obviously does the math and comes to the same conclusion.
If it was more cost efficient to wet lease and pay the penalty payments then why increase the fleet count consistently and increase FDX pilot jobs? Why not just outsource and pay the penalty payments? A bean counter obviously does the math and comes to the same conclusion.
Yes but remember that they were also parking MDs. There is a cost with that fleet as well. It’s not just a manning equation. But I agree they will do what is most cost efficient. They’ve been outsourcing for many years (not counting peak) and now they won’t. So sometimes it is better for management to outsource our jobs and sometimes it isn’t. The only thing that can change that is a change to manning or cost in scope. So theoretically more restrictive scope language would’ve prevented the outsourcing of our jobs to begin with.
#154
Banned
Joined: Jun 2018
Posts: 1,838
Likes: 0
Nice username. I am flattered.First I wasn’t a FedEx pilot, according to the 12 angry men, and now I am a management stooge.
How many other usernames do you have? 2 posts? Only replying to me? Are you trying to make yourself sound loud by having numerous accounts. Much like Twitter.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post



