View Single Post
Old 03-28-2008 | 06:42 AM
  #122  
JetJock16's Avatar
JetJock16
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 2,963
Likes: 0
From: SkyWest Capt.
Default

Originally Posted by fosters
Yes, to a point.

Here's some more numbers (all average):

Horizon Q400
Pounds/hr: 2130
Speed: 262

Horizon -700
Pounds/hr: 2190
Speed: 351

Almost the same average fuel burn for going 33% faster (therefore 33% less fuel burn). Turboprops are great for short hops but there is a reason the airlines don't use them on transcons .
Yes, I agree.

T-Props are for hops less than 1.5 hours. Jets when compared to the same shorts routes are extremely inefficient. Just run the numbers for the CR9 between ATL and GSP then compare it to a Q400 on a similar short hope. (compare the CR9 to the Q4 because there are basically configured for the same number of seats)

BTW, we usually burn about 3000-3600 lbs of fuel between ATL and GSP (25 minute FLT).

We all know that on longer routes Jet are more efficient but when it comes to 400 miles or less, props will almost always win out.

Last edited by JetJock16; 03-28-2008 at 06:58 AM.
Reply