Originally Posted by
Buck Rogers
I find this ^^^^ to be very profound. The folks that say "money is money...doesn't matter if it is a retro check or a signing bonus", miss the boat IMHO. They either miss the nuances of the two(retro/signing bonus), or understand the nuances and are content to feather their bed at the expense of those that have/will retire since the amendable date.
I’m all for this because of multiple reasons. Retro is the best answer, and may protect younger guys later down the road too, where a signing bonus may not.
Signed, not someone super senior.