Originally Posted by
Gone Flying
i don’t think 20-04 was perfect, I would have rather a deal that brought us all back and honored seniority a little more. but the reasons being peddled by some on FB to vote no seemed to be more to spite the UNAs than to fix the problems.
Personally, I think without the VEOP being as popular, we absolutely would have furloughed on 1 October.
The VEOP did by far the best benefit for everyone. The Oct. 1 date slid to November and then the vote in December. By January it was obvious UNAs were going to be training. It was a flawed LOA but I am glad we set a precedent of doing for our own (with .gov assistance) rather than just accept the furlough and cut people loose. For those who went through it in the early 2000s It sucked, and that is to be avoided if at all possible.
As far as one attention seeker on book face, WGAS.
He will spout his BS, the 2% rule applies here. The UNA haters are part of that same 2%.