Originally Posted by
MoonShot
One of the many reasons you include retirees in the retro is so the 63+ crowd doesn’t try to accept a substandard contract just to grab something before they head out the door. You want them to hold out for a good contract.
Not sure the dynamics at Alaska but didn’t they just vote in a deal without retro? The bar has been set (low). People are going to single issue vote based on retro vs bonus?