Originally Posted by
notEnuf
I heard he was pushing to delay it which would work the same as not having the vote, yet. I also heard he was opposed to it because it was to aggressive and would make it difficult for him to reach out to the company.* I don't know if it's true but people who support him have said similar things.
*rumor disclaimer TIFWIW
If these conversations happened behind closed doors, it's pretty disrespectful for them to be leaked. I want reps who aren't afraid to be a dissenting voice behind closed doors as long as the right decision is eventually made. So maybe he wanted to wait? Maybe he wanted to do it earlier? It's all irrelevant because he eventually voted for it. You know his opponent voted no on? LOA 20-04. Imagine if we had true dissenting voices during the TA1 fiasco.