Originally Posted by
Vsop
MC from 66 sent an email explaining his votes. This part is interesting to me. DH brings an approach that will get us across the finish line in Section 6 in a timely manner,…
Timely and successful TAs haven’t happened in a long time.
I don’t know much about either of the candidates that got votes. I’m part of 66, but have never met my reps. To me TK has seemed ok from his com emails. I do think MC’s vote is questionable. The pilots that elected TK to represent them probably would have wanted him to be the MEC chair too.
Even with my doubts about our new MEC chairman, I think it is too soon to recall reps. Save the hammer for when/if they deliver an unsatisfactory TA.
I am with you in 66. TK has been a decent rep, returned my emails and phone calls, went to bat for me with CPO over Covid Nofly issue, and has been overall a good pilot advocate. I was disappointed that MC (66vice chair) voted against him, but ,…maybe …there is more to the story. I read MC ‘s email to Us explaining ,but it falls short of the telling why he voted and the whole story. I don’t know if I will support a recall of MC, as there has to be more details coming forth, but I am leaning towards TC and why didn’t you support the 66 chair.
Really need more info.