Originally Posted by
schloppy1
The fact that the company so readily talks about their plans for third party lift makes me think there was a large give back on scope. I sincerely hope I’m wrong.
What else needs to be given back for them to unlimitedly continue wet leasing and using belly freight? Maybe I’m not understanding our scope language (not an attorney) but there doesn’t seem to be much of any substantial limits on what they can do. It’s almost like we can be a shell company if they really wanted us to be.