Originally Posted by
Swakid8
Last time I checked, Republic isn’t the military. This comparison isn’t valid. Let’s stop bringing up Military comparisons up….
Republic is an employer. The military is an employer.
Students signed a contract with Republic. Enlistees and Officers sign a contract with the military.
Republic hired ab initio applicants with no prior experience, and provided their training in exchange for an agreement that the applicant would provide a minimum amount of service to Republic.
The military hires applicants with no prior experience, provides their training and requires an agreement that the new hire provide a minimum amount of service to the military.
Applicants to Republic's training program know what they're signing when they sign the contract. Enlistees and officers in the military knkow what they're signing when they sign the contract.
Republic's contract is legally enforceable, and is a legal document. A contract between a soldier/airman/sailor, etc, is a legally enforceable document.
Terms and agreements are clearly spelled out in a legal contract between applicants and. Republic. Terms and agreements are clearly spelled out in a legal contract between enlistees and officers and the military.
Republic is willing to enforce its contract through legal action when that contract has been broken, and the applicant refuses to fulfill his or her obligations. The military is willing and able to enforce its contract through legal action, incarceration, and other means, if the contract has been broken and the applicant refuses to fulfill his or her obligations.
You don't see the similarities. Understood. Perhaps you don't see this post, because you are blind.