Originally Posted by
Hacker15e
What is different is that we now have at least three executive-level leaders who are explicitly telegraphing their intent to use subcontracting to reduce use of our own trunk aircraft and pilots.
Just because the current contract has lousy scope is not a reason to vote for a TA that also has lousyER scope.
I added the "ER" for clarification.
The scope language in TA1 makes it cheaper to wet lease. That is a problem we don't need.