Thread: TA is here
View Single Post
Old 06-25-2023 | 01:50 PM
  #566  
echelon
Line Holder
 
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 683
Likes: 16
Default

Originally Posted by ShyGuy
82% said yes because the union fought for the cornerstone issues we asked them (eg, scope). I don’t recall people asking/demanding snap up provisions. This contract met the requirements of what we were asking for. You’ll get 318 Sept 1 as worse case and then Sept 2024 will be more than 331.



What hope you referring to? The pilot group asked for 3 large groups for this contract. We met that goal. Having a snap up was never discussed
One, speak for yourself - It's funny to think back on when "5th best" was a rallying cry for this group now that we'll soon be a distant 7th or 8th (AFTER a round of negotiations!), but anyway, 6 years ago when that was a thing it was clear that preventing ourselves from being relegated to last place, or close to it, was important. It was a priority for me and my rep knew that.

And two - The ENTIRE contract was open for negotiations. If pilots weren't asking the NC/reps for enough, including a snap up provision, isn't that the problem?
Reply