Originally Posted by
jackryan
That’s great and all, but what about the 5800 that still have to work under the rest of the contract sections, most of which weren’t even addressed in TA1 openers, that are by far industry worst? Industry worst seat lock language, system bid frequency, lack of true min day, no hotels for recurrent/ ITU, unlimited operational emergency usage by the company to extend to FARs, etc, etc.
What is troubling for me is that the conversation is, and always will be about retirement. It’ll never be about making this a good place to work while we’re actually doing it, and that’s troubling.
fellow poster thanks for chiming in. TA1.0 was inadequate. We have folks talking about scope, pay rates, concessions, retro , etc (you get the picture). I am just highlighting yet another key failure of that document.
I have 3-4 contracts left here and want this place improved as well. The thread is called “No One Left Behind”. We are going in the same direction.
Let’s GO!