Originally Posted by
waldo135
My point was, it would not have all bad for everyone. Some guys would have won big, some may have lost a little. Those that thought they might lose something made enough noise, or were in the right position, to make sure we never find out. What if it had worked well and they had opened VBs in DCA, AUS, DFW, MCO, FLL/MIA…That’s potentially a large group of pilots that would have benefited greatly. We’ll never know.
I think we can all agree that, for better or worse, VBs ala MOU 16-03 are dead and buried.
I wonder if we might be able to frame how VBs
could be written into C26 (or a non-section-6 MOU like last time) (I know, long time from now) to prevent a repeat of history.
Do you think it is possible to have VBs that
this pilot group would approve/desire? We, as a 2023 pilot group look very different than we did in 2016/17/18 when MOU 16-03, the extension and subsequent takedown occured.