Originally Posted by
GrayFlyer
Rumors from where? How does the "timing make sense" when this motion 167 was submitted in September, per the date stamps? A lot of sweeping statements here, not trying to poke holes but amplifying information would be appreciated.
DOJ expert witnesses are due on the stand any day and according to their depos they don't agree that Jetblue is a maverick or disrupter in the industry. The minor problem is that the DOJ argued this very point in the NEA case and won.
The motion lays out pretty clearly why this is an issue in an argument.