Originally Posted by
Skyward
I default to a no vote until convinced otherwise, so guess I can say at this point I'd be a no. That said, I will read it all and decide once I have a real TA to vote on. However, the admitted lack of ugraded hotel/transportation language, adding co terminals and some other things has me concerned. The LCO might be awesome, but I need to see the details. Moveup as a PMer has really padded my paychecks 😁. I really hope the re-write is better and not just different. My hopes are high, but there are some red flags. I will trust the NC and allow the MEC to speak for me, but I will verify when I see it. I have never yoted "yes" on anything in my 20+ year airline career except to strike (twice). Hopefully they will knock it out of the park so I can break that record. We'll see.
It wasn't that long ago SWAPA was warning us about interactions with FAs on the vans and in hotels... so how bout we fix that! Why should FAs influence our van times, hotel locations, etc. Why no SWAPA Hotel Committee.... Even my regional back in the day had a union hotel committee. That's been industry standard for decades. There is a fundamental change that could really improve our QOL here. I've grown weary of the expected entourage that has to move as a group and wait for everyone to assemble.
Also, are we seriously considering having to cover multiple airports from one base... seriously??? That screams "concession" to me.
Real disability and protections while on disability are an absolute must-have
Yep....that's a good way to put it!
.