Originally Posted by
JohnBurke
It's absolutely conspiracy bull ****.
Timing is not evidence. It's circumstance.
You don't know that a course was flown to avoid radar. That's wild speculative conjecture. It also sounds like you've never flown over the ocean.
Pieces of aircraft could have wound up almost anywhere in the world. If those pieces had been in the Indian Ocean for a time, obviously they might contain "marine growth consistent with..." but that's not evidence of anything other than a piece of an airframe. It describes nothing of intent in the operation of the aircrft, course, or anything else.
Maybe if you say the words slower or faster you'll sound more convincing. Put some space aliens in there, or baby-eating pizza shops. Maybe some vaccine stories, to really sell it. That's the ticket.
whoa dude. You must have me confused with someone else. I just post the Hillary stuff because I think it is funny. Oh, and Democrats do not “eat babies” in Pizza shops. That is gross, and a little ridiculous, they drain their blood and drink it to stay young. Even my explanation is not exactly accurate. They don’t just drink the blood. They extract the
adrenochrome from the blood and drink that.
Anyway, them going dark at the FIR boundary and making a turn and heading for the ocean then turning when “civilian” radars can’t see them is not a “coincidence“.
You also said it might not be in the Indian Ocean! Well, the “evidence” found on the recovered pieces says otherwise. Sorry, so mistook you for someone that was a little more educated. But I can help. For an object to have marine growth consistent with being in the Indian Ocean for a period of time, it can be concluded that it has been in the Indian Ocean for that time. It was also found, on a beach… in the Indian Ocean.
but you keep thinking it is in a jungle in Cambodia near Hillary Clinton’s child blood harvesting compound.