View Single Post
Old 12-19-2023 | 07:27 PM
  #316  
AntiCompanyMan
On Reserve
 
Joined: Apr 2023
Posts: 126
Likes: 105
Default

Originally Posted by fcoolaiddrinker
Spirit won’t exist soon and alligiant is a travel Company. People need to go read the snap up language right under the pay rate table in the proposal. That’s the peer group. It’s defined. You’ll notice ups and fedex are not there either.
I agree. I wasn't saying otherwise. That's why I said "I dont know any F9 pilots who view allegiant as the primary peer group."

I don't think either of those companies are relevant contract references in the current environment.


Originally Posted by HSCompressor
are you for real with this post? Every time I turn around all I hear is how we are second rate, lower tier, ULCC pilots who will never get legacy rates or benefits. And people actually seem like they believe it.

if you make one post on this forum how we should be paid like Delta, the first thing everyone says is if you wanna be paid like delta, then you need to go to delta.


I say again. Are you for real with this post?
Did you read my post? Where in my post did I say F9 pilots are second-rate and deserve lesser compensation? Where in my post did I say ULCC pilots deserve lesser benefits? Where in my post did I say "go to Delta"?

Or are you just mad because I called out your imprecise language that resulted in a nonsensical post?

You said
Originally Posted by HSCompressor
SW is a “low cost carrier”. Maybe we should act more like SW is our peer group, and less like Allegiant."
You can't bring up the SW business model as a reason for why they should be primarily considered, and then reject my observation that F9 is a different business model than SW because it means settling for a lesser tier. You're effectively saying "we are just like Southwest," and then rebutting my point by saying "our differences from Southwest don't matter because we fly comparable equipment."

Pick a lane dude. Glad you're not a negotiator, because you're unable to stay rhetorically consistent.

Feel free to re-read my post, because your reading comprehension is a little bit concerning. Maybe read it a third time before you respond. Please, quote it and let me know.

You said:

Originally Posted by HSCompressor
Maybe we should act more like SW is our peer group, and less like Allegiant.

just sayin.
I'm just clarifying who the "we" is you're griping at? I don't know ANY F9 pilots who agree that Allegiant is a relevant reference point.

Who is the "we" that you are saying needs to "act" like SW is the peer group? Are you mad at the union? Mad at the pilot group? Your language is objectively vague, and your post is utterly nonsensical.

The fact is we most likely agree on the sentiment. I'm just questioning why you are annoyed at the union/pilot group for not "acting like" they deserve a literally just announced/rumored and unconfirmed SW contract? You didn't really make any intelligible point.

If you said, "hey, this should be our target," then great, I hope you guys achieve that. That's not what you said though.

I hope F9 pilots can achieve a contract akin to the rumored Southwest contract.
Reply