View Single Post
Old 01-09-2024 | 08:21 AM
  #41  
notEnuf's Avatar
notEnuf
Racketeer
 
Joined: Mar 2015
Posts: 13,364
Likes: 846
From: N60.4858 W149.9327
Default

Originally Posted by Gunfighter
How about everyone based in ATL. Many would quit before moving, myself included. It would require Delta IT moving forward a century in technology, but it's possible.

I'm in favor of keeping seniority within BES when covering trips. That is the point of a B. Exercise of seniority for BES choces is avialable monthly via the AE process. If a pilot can't hold a BES, should they be flying there? If a pilot can hold BES and choses not to, should they be flying there? Instead of NYC 330B flying OOBWS, maybe they could bid in base for what their seniority can hold?

Please draw me a picture using PWA trip coverage sequence where OOBWS does not cover a trip at single pay instead of 2x pay. My comprehension of PWA trip coverage is that the next step after single pay OOBWS was GS. Did I miss something in trip coverage or are we on different topics?

WRT staffing, OOBWS ensures we can keep staffing lower in ATL because NYC pilots will pick up the trips. It actually works against us by artificially inflating the staffing requriements for NYC while lowering the staffing required in ATL.
All it does is shift the GS to the less desirable base making that base more expesive to operate. That in turn makes the company choose to pay more if they grow a base nobody wants. The coverage ladder puts priority on cost to the company over base assignment. It is what it is.
Reply