Originally Posted by
FangsF15
Our LTD plan has now essentially been made standard at all the big 4, most recently SWA. I don’t see that changing, or even realistic pressure being put on us to change it.
If it is ever an ‘issue’ in negotiations, I don’t think we will ever know. The company isn’t going to share their top line number with us. I just don’t see it as the boogeyman you do. As a result, I don’t see LTD ‘costs’ as a good counter argument to 67. It’s okay to disagree.
I think you make good points and have offered a different perspective. You are right, we never know their number, but I know this cost increase would be accounted for in it.
If it passes, they may be open about the cost increase in negotiations. Or, it becomes another line on a spreadsheet we will never see for something most people didn’t really want. We may never know how it impacts us.