Originally Posted by
Anthrax
I’m not talking about PM.
I know you weren’t. But you were intimating that NC members close to retirement will negotiate a CBA that is overly beneficial to their own retirement. So, we got a crappy TA because a NC member (PW) was close to retirement and that was a problem. But there’s no problem now with the chairman of the NC being as close (or closer) to retirement than PW was?