Originally Posted by
FangsF15
My understanding is that, given the binary choice of a take-it-or-leave-it offer, he recommended "take it", to solve the rampant IA out-of-seniority problem. It was not his idea, per se.
That said, he is running for C44 rep, and though I strongly disagree with this one thing, will enthusiastically vote for him for Rep. I don't need to agree with every position to recognize a strong candidate and support them.
And this is why so many folks were upset abou it, right here.
I wish him well, hopefully we can get some staunch pilot advocates in. Agreed about your point about not needed to agree with every position. It's like my non rev philosophy during an IROP, take the one that gets you moving where you need to go.