View Single Post
Old 01-14-2025 | 10:10 AM
  #2861  
crewdawg
Moderator
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 7,490
Likes: 484
Default

Originally Posted by 172skychicken
I know this is likely tongue in cheek, but does anyone seriously have a desire to go back to this? It made trip coverage so clunky and inefficient that it opened up a whole pandoras box of unintended consequences. If you don't want to be called for a trip that you can't hold, turn auto accept on. There are a ton of areas where negotiating capital could be better spent.

Yes, we should have never gotten rid of of it. We gave a away alot when we completely dumped the batch sizes. I agree they needed to be loosened a bit, but 5 was more than enough for standards callouts, I could have seen a graduated scales as it neared sign-in time. But no limits is insanity and lots of lost leverage.

Everyone loves to say just turn on auto accept, but it's not always a great option because there is just no great way to have them sorted. I concede that often middle of the night calls are single trips, but I've had quite a few instnace of 3-5 sent out at once. Also, they'd need to make it much easier to turn on/off auto-ack.


Originally Posted by SideStickMonkey
Two, no.

Auto accept isn't the answer either. We gave away the farm with this concession for some 23M7 logs, lol

Lol right. Logs that supposedly can't even be verfied other than "trust us bro." Scheduling can't get even follow the contract as is, I have zero faith in that log.
Reply