Originally Posted by
FliFast
Thanks Flyer for the info.
One more question, we see/heard/read the MD, opps, Super-80 is being parked because it is a gas guzzler and possibly because it is near the end of it's useful life and the recent FAA debacle with the wiring harnesses.
Here's my question, asked in kind of an oblique fashion:
The MD80 burns about 6,000 lbs in cruise vs just over 5000 for the 737, and holds a few less bodies. The MD80 has a hard time getting above 33,000 feet unless near empty, and 37,000 feet is a rarety, thus higher fuel flows. I see the argument that way, but my question is, how cheap are they to operate otherwise (maint/insurance/landing fees/lease fees) vs the 737.
Just curious if the extra 1,000 lbs per hour at cruise is offset by other factors...thanks in advance.
FF
FF,
Can't seem to find the specific numbers, just the general statement that we have "reached the tipping point". Our leases on the 80 are very low or outright owned, which allows us to park them with little cost.
The savings in fuel, initially alone makes up the difference. If you take one S80 and average 10 hours of flying a day for the month at a fuel rate of $2.90 a gallon, the 737 will save roughly $160,000 a month, which almost absorbs the cost of the higher lease difference.
When you add the ability to put more people and cargo on, with long term fleet streamlining for crews and maintenance it makes a lot of sense.
Regards,
AAflyer
P.S. The numbers above are mine, and are rough. If I can ever find that message will drop a note.