Originally Posted by
REF 5
I don’t pretend to know but the intent of what SRC Chairman explained was clear. Something that is practiced by the company and is agreement with SWAPA should be codified in language. Fix it.
I agree the language should be codified but maybe this language wasn't correct and that's why 17 -10 NO .
Or maybe they did a bad job of educating the BOD.
sure would be nice if we got more than " what's being said on FB is false".