Originally Posted by
MatthewAMEL
If you are referencing VOD, we DON'T have language. We have past practice. They wanted clear language that aligned with the practice.
But we have no idea if that was the stumbling block for it's passage. Just that's what some alarmist posted was the reason that turns out to be false.
I have no idea why it was rejected. But I did send an email to my reps asking why they voted the way they did.
Hopefully, there will be comms on this out soon.
Someone replied on idiot book. They said it was because the new language wasn’t clear. I guess they had similar concerns as the alarmist. There is also conflicting reports as to who briefed them on it. But who the heck knows after all it’s swapull land. Were a no vote is very unusual.