Originally Posted by
Viper25
So you are in the camp that removing easily violatable sections of the contract is a concession because you lose out on the remedy?
The contract is not made or intended to be a remedy paying machine. That is a secondary and unintended effect.
Sorry, I just don’t think so. If a robot calls you instead of a human, and that was made possible because positive space commuting was provided in exchange, or some other big win, then I think that’s good. Yeah I guess you’ll lose out on being compensated because now management is actually following the contract. If you see that as a concession then I agree to disagree.
It’s definitely something we can agree to disagree on, but your statement that it does not have an effect on QOL is still 100 percent false. Maybe not your QOL but we’re a big group. I don’t commute but I don’t get excited thinking about what we could trade our commuter clause for.
In a more general sense, I don’t think we should be looking for things to give away. Whatever happened to no concessions? There’s a reason the company wants CNO.
In fact now that I think about it, the effects aren’t limited to just reserves. Ever GS? Both of the trips that were removed for me this year went out as GS. Maybe it helped your QOL and you didn’t even know it.