Originally Posted by
skitheline
Oh please. I’ve read more than a few posts from different users now accusing “Jr” of making side deals. As if “Sr” isn’t out there doing the exact same thing. I’ve seen many an IA go out to senior. Let’s not pretend there’s just one demographic willing to totally ignore the contract and make a deal.
Originally Posted by
NJGov
Apart from the “re-establishing order of seniority for call-outs”
what gains do you see?
And id argue all we did was bring them into compliance for a violation they were committing.
Was there harm to us? Sure. But they were acting illegally as far as the contract was concerned
we should have brought them to a grievance for violating the contract.
Then we give them a settlement on the already settled grievance? C’mon we are just adding insult to injury
the Company is beating us over the head over and over and just providing a band-aid and a hollow apology before they start beating again next week
qhcp is not a win; this is something we already had a settlement for
and you who think CS going to magically comply with the contract now are out of your mind - what’s a SIL? It’s not a violation til an arbitrator says so, etc etc
stop being so afraid and let’s tell ALPA to grow a set and let’s fight back
Expressly prohibiting skipping pilots within a step. Requiring the identification of a harmed pilot before skipping steps. It locks them out from moving on until they identify the pilot. Additional 100% penalty for using IA free for all.
In the vast majority of cases, there were no violations. Under emergency coverage, they can pretty much do whatever they want. The example I was given, if a pilot calls out sick in Maui, they can call every qualified pilot in Maui to operate it back as long as the proper pilot was paid.