Originally Posted by
notEnuf
This MOU conflates sick and coverage to say we got sick as a "get" for coverage issues is disingenuous. They did this to solve two separate (multiple) grievance issues. They were completely independant until this MOU combined them to show a "gain." The horse is dead but next summer I reserve the right to revive it and say I told you so when phones are blowing up and people are sick of answering the calls for trips they will never hold.
You didn’t respond to 90% of my post about the easy buttons. Only the small sick leave part.
Regardless, I do agree with you that we should have gotten a much better deal. I would have figured we would with the big evidence and leverage it appears we had (and as Fangs alluded to). I really would’ve liked to have seen QS be a higher premium multiplier and/or 23M7 handcuffed to 4 hours or less.